Monday, November 29, 2010

Assignment 5

Part 1- Interview anyone who likes to pick up errors in the newspapers or other material they read, or interview anyone about how often they find mistakes in books, magazines, newspapers, or even on radio and television.

I interviewed 3 people to compare which mistakes they find and to see which medium they find the mistakes in most often.

Part 2- Write a 500 word article in the third person about the person you interviewed and the mistakes they find.

Three Waikerie locals commented on the mistakes they find in newspapers, books, magazines, on radio and television and how often they find them.

Sharon Lennell reads the Advertiser, the Sunday Mail, the Riverland Weekly, and the River News. She commented that in every newspaper there is at least one mistake and said they usually spell names wrong most often, especially with best players in the footy score sheets. She also said that in some recipes that are published in magazines or newspapers, they leave out various ingredients. In comparison Gladys Noll said that she doesn't find too many mistakes in newspapers, however she said the choice of words could be different. Mrs. Noll also said that grammar and spelling of names were also problems that she picked up. Pat Allen said she finds quite a few mistakes, particularly in The River News which she reads regularly. The mistakes Pat Allen finds are to do with punctuation, name spelling, and the date or year being "muddled up".

Mrs. Lennell said she finds plenty of mistakes in magazines. She enjoys reading the That's Life publication and said in the Secret Story section they word it differently and use American instead of Australian spelling for some words. Pat Allen said she doesn't buy magazines much but said in Lifeline, the television program times aren't always what they are supposed to be. For example, a channel's programs are listed for a certain program to be shown at a certain time on a certain day, and then on that day the channel broadcasts a different program in that timeslot. However, Pat Allen said she finds more mistakes in books, and sometimes finds two of the same pages printed in books.

With regard to radio and television, Sharon Lennell said she finds mistakes on both mediums all the time. She mentioned in particular the football radio commentators who call out the wrong names and predict goals before the players have even kicked for a goal. She said on television there is a lot of false advertising and said certain stations advertise TV shows on the wrong days. Mrs Noll said she listens to Bronwyn Wade on the Riverland Agricultural Horticultural radio program and also the ABC radio. Mrs Noll said that while the ABC radio does have some mistakes she said they weren't too bad. She also added that she enjoys watching the SBS World News on television.

All interviewees agreed that it's very frustrating for them when they find mistakes. Sharon Lennell remarked, "You expect people to get it right and then they don't." Pat Allen said that when she finds mistakes on television she doesn't know who to ring or blame... "Whether it's the station or the people who write the programs." When Gladys Noll finds mistakes she wonders if the writers or journalists have researched a topic properly and debates how accurate the story is. She added, "It frustrates me if different stories are told about the same topic."

Sharon Lennell and Gladys Noll thought it is worse to find mistakes in newspapers rather than on television or radio. Gladys Noll commented, " I think it is worse because they have to proofread it before it is printed. Television is different. With newspapers they can reread it. Whereas if you say something and two hours later are asked what you said, it is harder to remember." However, Pat Allen said because she doesn't read newspapers that often she finds it more annoying when she finds mistakes on television channels.

Part 3- Once you are happy with the article, print it out and see how many errors you can find. Highlight the text to show how you have fixed the errors.

I have done part 3 but I think it needs more improving so once I have edited it some more and have time I shall add it!

Monday, November 15, 2010

Assignment 4


Part 1

Interview 3 people about their attitudes towards print media, internet, radio, television news and current affairs programs.

Part 2

Write an article that shows how trustworthy they believe each medium, and the reporters who write for them to be.




I interviewed fellow TAFE student Belinda-Jane Clark, Waikerie Librarian Michael Cox and Uni student Emily Hudson about their attitudes towards various media and the reporters/journalists who work for each type.

When I asked how trustworthy my interviewees find newspaper articles and the journalists who write them to be, Belinda-Jane Clark responded as follows...

"I expect 'news' articles to be trustworthy- they are meant to be telling us truthfully what is going on. However I understand that some owners of this media would prevent certain articles even being printed, if it were going against their views, or would impact them financially. When it comes to other articles in the newspaper, like human interest or celebrity gossip, I take it with caution as you don't know why they have produced that story in the first place-for example, is there an underlying reason why they are always picking on Lady GaGa? I can't say I don't trust journalists per se, but you can always spot someone who is trying to lead you in a certain direction."

Michael Cox stated the fact that journalists have to sell newspapers therefore they always try to sensationalise a story to make it more readable.

However he did add, "Freelance journalists who are not connected to a particular paper are probably more trustworthy. Overall I tend to be wary what I read in articles and tend to question some of their findings."

Journalists sometimes delete information or twist the meanings of their articles. Emily Hudson suggested that journalists don't necessarily change or omit facts for their own purpose but rather for the employer they work for.

She said, "I believe it is illegal to report nonfactual information, but there is a difference between writing lies and altering the truth to make it sound more exciting and dramatic. For example, the Delhi Games was reported to be an epic disaster, and this was backed up by 'horrible pictures of collapsing bridges, leaking rooms and decrepit rooms for athletes'. What they omitted, in many cases, was the rest of it all; the beautiful gardens, spectacular arenas and a country that was so excited to be welcoming visitors and competitors to their country."

The interviewees were all in agreement that they wouldn't trust information from the internet solely for educational purposes due to misinformation. Belinda-Jane Clark believes cross-referencing with books as well as the internet is the best option. Emily Hudson said she would trust the internet less than other educational sources especially if it is from an "unreliable, un-referenced site". Michael Cox would rather use a reputable database such as Britannica because he said the information is more likely to be checked before approval. However Mr. Cox added, "...information does change, for example, scientific theories like evolution."

Emily Hudson said she has to check that the information she finds over the net is correct because she is studying for her University degree. Michael Cox and Belinda-Jane Clark both admitted that they don't always verify the information they find over the internet, but they both still try to look for inconsistencies and try to make sure the sites are reputable.

Overall Michael Cox and Emily Hudson believe the internet is a powerful tool if utilized properly. Belinda-Jane Clark and Mr. Cox think that everything from the net should be taken with a grain of salt, because there is no one to check all the sites. Two of the interviewees also said it can be used by "cunning religious/political crackpots" to brainwash people into believing their ideas to form a group of supporters. However, Belinda-Jane and Emily Hudson agreed that the genuine websites are full of great and quality information.

Belinda-Jane Clark sums up the opinion of most of the interviewees when she describes how reliable she thinks radio presenters are:

"On news shows and talkback-very reliable, they need to have the facts before they present them. But on things like morning shows, they can speak without backup, making allegations etc. that may not be fully backed up by facts."

Emily Hudson said most of the radio shows are made up of the presenter's/writer's opinion which makes what they say unreliable and Michael Cox said the radio presenters/writers tend to "exaggerate, elaborate, and milk issues for all they are worth" to keep people listening.

All the interviewees believed TV news reporters/readers were more trustworthy compared to journalists who work for current affairs programs. Current affairs programs were deemed less credible, less newsworthy and are described by one interviewee as, "overdramatised, horribly inaccurate" and that they, "make a soap opera out of reality".

Two interviewees thought that newspapers were the most trustworthy out of the selected mediums because "... their work is forever evidence of right or wrong doing" and "...there should be more research and more reliable sources." The other interviewee said that it was too hard to decide as a lot of mediums are owned by the same people/companies but believed that the internet was the least reliable because, "it is such a massive source of information and it makes it harder to filter the good from the bad."





Despite the fact that they find it "dodgy", Emily Hudson and Belinda-Jane Clark use the internet most often and also use it for educational purposes. Michael Cox uses newspapers most often and for educational purposes would also use: newspapers, magazines, and research journals that specialise in particular topics. He added, "I wouldn't use the internet too often."

Monday, November 1, 2010

LOLcats

Some LOL cat pics for you! They always make me smile :D Enjoy










































Thursday, October 21, 2010

Poptarts

So I went to Waikerie's new lolly shop called Steve's Sweets the other week to get myself some sour lollies. I found them... eventually. I love eating Warheads, they are sour to begin with, maybe for about 30 seconds and then they are really sweet. If you haven't heard of them they are fairly small and have fruity flavours like apple, lemon, blue raspberry etc.



Well anyway so after I found the Warheards, I saw a Hershey's Cookies and Cream bar that I just HAD to have! I'm a little bit of a chocoholic. I love just about everything apart from dark chocolate, despite the fact that I did eat a dark Lindt chocolate last night but that's about the only exception!




Then... what did my eyes spot?! An amazing thing called a Poptart! Please correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure they originated from America right? I have never tried poptarts before so I found it very intriguing.




It said on the packet instructions to microwave it for 3 secs on high. My microwave doesnt have a high, medium, or low setting so I guessed and went for 30 secs. I think 20 secs is better and that's what I did for my second one. It doesn't make the inside as hot. (I burnt my tongue on the first one :S)

Yes that is white and milk chocolatey type goodness oozing out of the poptart! XD
(3rd pic)
I think I shall be needing to buy more of these in the future!

Monday, October 18, 2010

Assignment 3

Defamation

Defamation: a false accusation of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions.
Defamation- aspersion: an abusive attack on a person's character or good name.
http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=defamation

Part 1
The blogosphere is full of defamatory and offensive statements. See if you can find something that you feel goes somewhere near defamation, or would be sufficiently inflammatory to annoy a company or individual or class of people into a lawsuit.

Identify the text which you believe is defamatory, inflammatory or offensive enough to give rise to a lawsuit. Explain your reasons for choosing it.


Potential Defamation Case
http://www.cyberbullying.info/examples/msg.php?eg=frawley

Greg Frawley left Hurlstone Agriculture High School after unidentified students set up a website to accuse him and another teacher of being child molesters who should be killed.

The highlighted orange words above show reason enough to encourage the two falsely accused teachers to be annoyed enough to give rise to a lawsuit. I chose this passage because it is an interesting example of cyber-bullying. More often than not, cyber-bullying is directed towards teenagers or younger children that are in the same school classes as the cyber bullies. In this case the abuse is directed at two high school teachers. It would take a very strong willed or several strong willed students to want to do something like this, and were taking a big risk by creating the website. Had the students been found out by the two teachers mentioned on the website, they may have been charged. Below is a more in depth article about the case.

The full story is featured here on the Sydney Morning Herald website:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/11/14/1100384429648.html?from=storylhs

This is a shorter version of the story...

Teachers subject to internet hate campaigns seek support
By Linda Doherty, Education Editor
Nov 15, 2004

A teacher vilified on a student-run website at a Sydney selective school has set up a support group for victims of web abuse by "flamers" who use the internet to publish malicious allegations.

Greg Frawley left Hurlstone Agricultural High School in the city's south-west after unidentified students set up a website "throwstones", to accuse him and another male teacher of being child molesters who should be killed.

The Hurlstone website, discovered in late July, recommended that the two teachers be "executed", accused some (other teachers) of paedophilia and one (teacher) of stealing. But in a letter to the director-general of the Department of Education, Mr. Frawley said the school did not initially lodge a critical incident report to the department to notify it that teachers could be at risk.

"Can you imagine how you would feel if a story posted on the internet stated that you were a child molester and that this message was rapidly communicated to students you taught?" Mr. Frawley wrote.

"You become an alien in your own world, stained with the worst social stigma of all... You start thinking that being dead is an option."

An education department spokesman said schools had sophisticated technology to monitor inappropriate internet use. But those behind the Hurlstone website have not been caught, and police say no charges will be laid.


Part 2

With your example for Part 1 in mind, imagine yourself as the offender, and then as the offended. Answer the following three questions from both points of view.

1. Why do people write these things?
2.What is their motivation?
3. Why would the offended people want to take action?

The Offender's Point of View

1.Why do people write these things?
They may not like the person or people for a particular reason. This case is about 2 teachers so maybe the offenders caused a lot of trouble with the teachers or didn't like their teaching methods. They may also be selfish kids who have not been disciplined enough to know the difference between what is right and wrong. They also may not feel compassion towards their victims and may even enjoy taunting them.

2.What is their motivation?
Boredom, expressing their opinions because they feel mistreated, or as I said they may enjoy causing trouble. They may also have no idea how to treat people due to their backgrounds or maybe that is the way their parents treated them when they were younger so they think this behaviour is normal.

3. Why would the offended people want to take action?
In the offenders point of view the offended people may want to take action to take revenge on them or to catch them in the act. They are probably only thinking about themselves and thinking along the lines of, "They want to get me into trouble". But they wouldn't get into trouble in the first place had they not caused any. The offenders may not realise how hurtful the statements they made are to the offended person's physical and psychological wellbeing.

The Offended Person's Point of View

1. Why do people write these things?
To damage the offended person's reputation and cause them pain. In this case I think this is what the offender's main aim was, as they had 4 websites made to defame teachers, not just one (website). If they had wanted to just complain about their teaching methods they could have either complained to the teacher themselves or talked to the principal, or if it was really bad the Minister of Education.

2.What is their motivation?
Again I think it was to cause trouble and from the articles I found it sounds like that's what the offended teachers thought too.

3.Why would the offended people want to take action?

In August 2004, one of the teachers, (Mr. Frawley) was talking to lawyers.

He wanted the Education Department to..." pursue defamation proceedings against the unknown students- and criminal prosecution for the death threats- to set a precedent to stop other technologically savvy students from copycat actions." He also contacted Yahoo Australia and begged them to shut down the student website involved in this case saying, "For every minute it (the website) continued operating the impact of defamation is growing out of control."

This teacher wanted to stop other people from committing defamation so that more people do not suffer from damaging accusations like this. His confidence was shattered from the comments on the website and it is unfortunate that the culprits were not found. They should have been taught a lesson so that they wouldn't be encouraged to start another website like this again. They might have by now.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/08/25/1093246584317.html







Friday, October 15, 2010

The lengths robbers will go to!


Found this on the ninemsn site... thought it was pretty funny this morning!

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/8107129/us-burglar-goes-overboard-with-disguise



US Burglar goes overboard with disguise




A US man has been caught trying to break into a museum dressed in a moss-like body suit often used by hunters and military snipers.


Disguised in a Ghillie suit, Greg Liascos was discovered when a police dog sniffed him out in nearby woods, The Daily Mail reported.


"His yelp gave him away," the policeman said, after initially thinking the dog was biting at the ground.


Security and surveillance was set up at the Rice Northwest Museum of Rocks and Minerals in Oregon after the caretaker noticed unusual dirt and debris gathering over a number of days.


The caretaker followed the trail to a lift shaft behind the wall of the museum toilets, where he found a large hole in the plywood wall.


He told police about the unusual find and one day later museum security guards reported a break-in which led to the man-hunt.


Police dogs tracked Liascos, 36, to a wooded enclave where he was found looking very much like part of the forest floor.


Liascos was arrested on charges on burglary and criminal mischief.

A picture of Greg Liascos, inside his disguise, and out.



Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Animal Cruelty Article

Animal lovers suggest harsher penalties for animal cruelty offenders


Several local pet owners/animal lovers agreed recently that harsher penalties for animal cruelty offenders would be a good idea to seriously consider. Ramco resident Margaret Russell suggested that the offenders should do some community work.

(Ramco is about 15 mins from Waikerie. If you want to know where Waikerie is, please Google it :D)

"I'd put them to work in animal shelters, make them clean them out, make them look at pets and animals and I tell you what, they'd stop and think about what they've done. What punishment do they get? Growled at or a smack on the fingers or just spoken to? They're not punished. By not punishing them are they learning anything? Why not let them do something, let them think about what they've done."

One pet owner said she wasn't aware of the current animal cruelty punishments. However she had heard of fines and jail terms being possible punishments but suggested that most get waived or reduced to an extent.

She added, "I believe that animals should be treated to the same protection from cruelty as humans, and people that perform acts of cruelty on animals should receive the same punishment for it, as if they had abused a person."


An article posted on the ABC's website on Saturday August 14, 2010 stated that Tasmania's RSPCA organisation has renewed calls for magistrates to impose harsher penalties for animal cruelty, reporting a 37 percent increase in complaints over the past year.

The Acting CEO Michael Linke says most of the complaints involved the treatment of domestic animals.

"One of the worst was a cat with broken hips being left in a person's backyard for five days," he said.

Mr. Linke is calling for tougher penalties.


"More jail terms, higher levels of financial penalties."


Mr. Linke says about ten percent of the complaints related to deliberate animal abuse.


Recent acts of animal cruelty


When the pet owners were asked whether they had seen or heard about any recent acts of animal cruelty, 4 out of the 6 interviewees had heard of several cases each.



Margaret Russell said she saw the case with "Snowy" the cat on the RSPCA Rescue Show on TV. (On July 3, 2010 Snowy had his legs tied up, and his ears were mutilated. He was then set alight and left to die.) This is the link to the NSW RSPCA website featuring Snowy's story: http://www.rspcansw.org.au/snowy.





This is Snowy before July 3.
















This is Snowy after July 3 at RSPCA shelter.









However Mrs. Russell had a story closer to home to tell.


"I know people at Sunlands, they moved out of their house and someone asked, "What about your cats?" And they said, "They're alright." She asked, "Well have you been fed today?" They replied, "Yeah why what's that got to do with it?" She said, "Well these cats are hungry." They said, "They'll be 'right." Well you don't just leave your animals, that's cruel. You should be responsible for what you've got. It's sad when you see cats starving hungry, that's why they catch the birds, small frogs and other animals."


"It really irks me; it really makes me so mad to see anybody being so cruel to a helpless, defenceless animal. It's shocking."


Another pet owner had heard of a "Cat in the garbage bin saga", where a woman threw a cat into a bin and it was left there for hours. She had also heard of many animal cruelty cases occurring in foreign countries, such as dancing bears and was also aware of hoarders; "... people taking large amounts of animals into their homes in appalling conditions with little food, water and protection."

Lyn Crowhurst had heard of the following animal cruelty acts: starvation of horses, maiming of cats, neglect of dogs and again the bears in India/Overseas were mentioned. (In Pakistan people are still bear baiting, despite it being illegal in most areas of the country. There are also dancing bears in India still. There are ongoing efforts to eradicate both of these practises permanently.)


Jeanie Walker, animal activist and last remaining Democrat candidate in Australia had this to say in February this year," It has been extensively researched and proven that cruelty to animals is a precursor to violence and cruelty against humans. If perpetrators of animal cruelty keep escaping punishment then we are promoting a more violent society and this is totally unacceptable to the Democrats and the Australian public."


When asked if the general public should be made more aware about animal cruelty, some interviewees commented that the public is already aware of it through TV and the media. However, 2 interviewees both thought that the consequences of animal cruelty should be made more conspicuous in an attempt to dissuade people from committing such horrible acts.


In Australia penalties for animal cruelty offences vary in each jurisdiction. Each state and territory has their own jail terms and fines as follows:


State Maximum jail term Maximum fine


ACT, 12 months (2 yrs for aggravated cruelty), $10,000 ($20,000 for

aggravated cruelty)


NSW, 6 months (5 yrs for aggravated cruelty), $5,500($22,000 for


aggravated cruelty)


NT, 12 months, $13,000 (regardless of

deliberate or negligent)


QLD, 2 yrs, $100,000 (regardless of

deliberate or negligent)


SA, 2 yrs (4 yrs for aggravated cruelty), $20,000 ($50,000 for

aggravated cruelty)



TAS, 12 months (18 months for aggravated cruelty), $12,000 ($24,000 for

aggravated cruelty)



VIC, 12 months (2 yrs for aggravated cruelty), $12,000 ($24,000 for

aggravated cruelty)



WA, 5 yrs, $50,000 (regardless of

deliberate or negligent)



These penalties came from the following article on the Australian RSPCA website which was last updated on Jan 14, 2010: http://kb.rspca.org.au/What-are-the-penalties-for-animal-cruelty-offences_271.html


Animal cruelty needs to be seen as a more prominent issue. More often than not animal cruelty articles are made the sub story in the news and are ignored or considered unworthy of our time. I hope this article has made some sort of an impact into some people's minds about how horrible it can be and has informed more people that there are serious consequences for anyone who commits cruel acts towards animals.



References


http://www.rspcansw.org.au/snowy

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/08/14/2982885.htm

http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/animal-cruelty-and-the-case-for-harsher-punishment/

http://sj.farmonline.com.au/news/state/agribusiness-and-general/general/last-democrat-targets-rspca-in-animal-rights-fight/1738717.aspx

http://www.dogslife.com.au/dogs_life_articles?cid=12561&pid=6698179

http://www.wspa.typepad.com/compassionateplanet/

http://www.grantanimalwishes.com/some-of-my-projects.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear-baiting

http://kb.rspca.org.au/What-are-the-penalties-for-animal-cruelty-offences_271.html

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Assignment 2

The other students in the Write Articles for Publications 2 course (Professional Writing) and I found out oh a few months ago now that we didn't have to add our assignments to our blogs!

However, we did have to make a blog and as far as I know we are being assessed on how well we manage our blogs. So I don't really have to do this, but as I assumed earlier that we did have to add our assignments on here, I guess I'm just going to keep going until the end of the course. (Only 8 assignments in total for Write for Publications 2) Yes I also know that it has taken me a while to blog these too.
So here goes...

Assignment 2

Part 1

Choose a subject for an article, and then a person or people to interview to make the proposed article viable.

I chose animal cruelty as my article subject and I wanted to interview some vets or a vet and some animal owners/animal lovers.

Arrange the interview(s). You may need to do more than one interview (to represent more than one point of view, or to augment the main interview)

Conduct the interview(s). Keep interviews short. Try not to let any single interview exceed 20 minutes.

Part 2

Complete and submit each of the following:

a) State the theme of your article. State the names and titles of the people you plan to interview. Write down the aim of the questions and the kind of response you want.

The theme of my article: (To discover) A rise or decline in animal cruelty and how to prevent it.

People I wanted to interview: Waikerie and or Berri Vets/vet nurses, and approximately 4 local pet owners.

Aim of my questions:

*To research whether animal cruelty is increasing
*To find methods of preventing animal cruelty
*To discover why animal cruelty occurs
*To learn the consequences of committing an act of animal cruelty
*To know what the general public and vet's opinions are about animal cruelty acts
*To see if there is a need to better inform the public about animal cruelty and its consequences

Response I would like:
I would like my interviewees to say, "Yes animal cruelty is increasing" so I can inform the readers of something new. If my interviewees say "No animal cruelty isn't increasing" and "No we don't need to make the public more aware about animal cruelty" then I don't have much to write about. However, it would be nice if it isn't increasing for the sake of the animals' welfare. I would also like to gauge from the interviewees a response about whether more media coverage or word of mouth is needed to spread the word about animal cruelty so that more people can react and take a stand against it.


b) Give a chronological summary of the interviews. Keep it short. Demonstrate to what extent- or not- your interview plans bore fruit.

I think I should have researched more about the more specific cases of animal cruelty instead of interviewing people in general about animal cruelty. I probably should have researched more before starting my interviews. Maybe I would have found more of a wide range of ideas and opinions about specific cases or maybe it is better that I just did general questions. I'm not sure how well my interviews or interview plans bore fruit. It's hard to judge just what people are going to say in an interview.

I managed to interview 6 pet owners including 3 of the people in Part 2 a). I rang and eventually emailed some questions to a vet in Berri but I have not had a response from them yet. (Berri is about 3 quarters of an hr away from Waikerie.)

There were a lot of different opinions about why people commit animal cruelty acts. Some thought it was due to a lack of responsibility and or they don't know how to look after or don't understand their animals. Interviewee Chris Steicke thought it was because some people may consider animals to be dumb and that they don't have feelings.

Others thought it was also due to power hungry people who like to feel they have control over their animals, seeing them as easy targets and take out their rage and frustrations out on them, especially if they don't know how to relate to animals.

Pet owner Margaret Russell said it was because, "They have too much time on their hands and they are just destructive."

Another person said some people use animals as a way to make money; by hoarding lots of animals to reproduce and then selling them.

I didn't really expect the pet owners/animal lovers to know everything about animal cruelty, especially regarding the rules and regulations if a person commits an act of animal cruelty. Most pet owners didn't know what the exact penalties are for committing animal cruelty. However, I did think there would be various opinions about whether animal cruelty is increasing or not so I thought it would be interesting to see how many people agreed or disagreed. Half of my interviewees thought animal cruelty is increasing and the other half disagreed or weren't sure.

Most interviewees agreed that there should be harsher penalties for people who commit animal cruelty acts and one suggested that the culprits do community service at a vet clinic; to teach them a lesson and so they can learn how animals act and how their harsh treatment affects the animals mentally and physically.

Some interviewees thought that there is enough media coverage about animal cruelty. However, some thought that there should be more coverage in newspapers and on TV, or just better campaigning for animal cruelty to show people how horrifying it is. Some also thought that the consequences (not just the acts) of animal cruelty should be emphasised more on TV.


Part 3

Write a summary, in 10 single sentence paragraphs of the proposed article. Remember, the article does not have to follow your original plan, but must pick up on the most important themes that came out of the interview(s).

This was before I wrote my article so I have a bit more information now. These paragraphs are a bit too general but these were what I had.


The reasons people commit animal cruelty varies.

Not sure if animal cruelty is on the rise.

How we can educate people about animals, reasons to get animals and and their behaviours.

The general public should be made more aware about animal cruelty via TV shows and other media.

The consequences of animal cruelty.

The consequences of animal cruelty (for the animals and the offenders) should be emphasized more through the media.

There should be harsher punishments for animal cruelty according to local pet owners.

Possible punishments for offenders could be community work at animal shelters/clinics.

Offenders should be prosecuted in the same manner as an offender who abuses another human being?

Will this decrease the amount of animal cruelty from occurring?

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Pavlova Saga

Over the past few weeks our Spanish exchange student, Mum and I made several Pavlova's in an attempt to discover which tastes better: the packet mix pavlova from the shops or home-made pav. (Also to teach the exchange student how to make her own pavlova when she runs out of the packet recipes... which she should soon as she is back in Spain now!)


For anyone who doesn't know, the Pavlova is an Australian dessert, mainly made from egg whites which is fluffy and is usually decorated with cream and fruit. (Our exchange student liked to try decorating some with nutella as well!)

In my opinion the packet mix looked better because it rose more but the home-made pavlova tasted way better n there were more chewy bits... a rare thing for pavlova or just ordinary meringue for that matter.



Mum and Raquel (exchange student) >>

Let's compare pavlovas... shall we?!





The photos below are of the packet mix pavlova.












Straight out of the oven.

Decorated with whipped cream,
strawberries and kiwi fruit... yuuuum!



And now for the home-made pav. (Below left. The one with kiwi fruit and strawberries is the packet mix pav.) Photos aren't staying in the right position for some odd reason!


A bit flatter and rounder... but just as yum!







Here is the recipe for the home-made Pavlova. You are more than welcome to try it out if you so desire!


PAVLOVA


Ingredients


*4 egg whites


*1 cup castor sugar


*1 teaspoon vinegar


*300-500 ml cream


*About 3 tablespoons of icing sugar/castor sugar to mix with cream


*Fruit to decorate




Method

Cover an oven tray with aluminium foil. Preheat oven to 250 degrees celcius (400 degrees F.)

Beat egg whites stiffly with vinegar using an electric beater (mixer). Add 4 teaspoons of the castor sugar and beat until mixture looks "dry" (about halfway through mixing process).

Add half of the remaining sugar gradually and beat until stiff peaks form. Beat in remaining sugar on low speed for about 1 minute.


Heap pavlova mixture onto oven tray, then form a plate or round shape- it should be approx. 9 inches (22 1/2 cm) in diameter.


Put into oven then reduce oven temperature to 100 degrees celsius (or 225 degrees F.) and bake for 1 hour.


Once it is cooked, remove from oven and cool on tray. (For about half an hour to an hour... otherwise if you try to decorate too soon the cream may melt!)


Whip cream with about 3 tablespoons (or whatever your desired amount is) of icing sugar/mixture. Spread cream over pavlova then decorate with fruit.




Sunday, September 5, 2010

How a bowl should be licked

Another cutesey email popped up this morning so I thought I'd share this one with you as well!


How A Bowl Should Be Licked:



How sweet. The owner grabbed a camera instead of chasing the puppy away!














"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawakened"

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

The Invasion of the Birds




Over the past 6 months-1 year, our house (my parent's) has been home to several Spoggies (local slang for Sparrows). They usually inhabit the underside of our timber roof which is a part of our extension to the house.

"Tweet, tweet."


"Tweet, tweet."


"Chirp, chirp."


"Chirp, chirp," comes the reply.


Every morning or so I hear them tweet, flap, flutter and scratch around in our roof. I must say I admire their courage, they must have a nest up there, and we've been trying to get them out for I don't know how long. It seems like quite a while though.

The effort for us to try and get them out results in frustration everytime. The roof is far too high for Mum, Dad or me to reach and when they fly out from one end of the roof they enter from the other side when they think we aren't watching!
Honestly, it seems like "The Attack of the Birds" to me. The way they sit there, staring at us with their little beady eyes in the bushes, trees and on our gutter (pipes that lead to the water tank).

Dad has at one stage tried to block off their main entry point with some steel wool but they just pushed it out the end. It didn't really help much because, as I said before, there are many other entry points along the roof. As I currently can't find our camera I cannot show you what our roof looks like but nevermind. However I have added some pics of the "culprits".

We didn't seem to have this trouble when we still had our cat over 2 years ago. Unfortunately our previous cat died of cancer and we haven't got another one since.
I too have tried getting the cheeky chirpers out of the roof by banging on the ceiling with my fists. This has worked a few times to get them moving, but they are very determined little tweeters. About half an hr to an hr later, they pluck up the courage again and strategise how to enter the roof without my seeing them!

All the other birds in the neighbourhood seem to find it very entertaining as well. I swear half of them are laughing at us in the mornings as we try to scare the Spoggies out of the roof. Our neighbours must find the sight of us hilarious too. Picture me in my bright pink pyjamas, jumping up and down on a chair, hitting the ceiling with my fist and mouthing what must look like shouts of rage- or insanity.

As I write this, one of the pudgy culprits is perched on our TV aerial trying to make me feel sorry for it by showing off his cute little head, small shiny eyes and waggily tail. Well guess what buddy, that's not going to work on me.

How about you feel sorry for me this time Mr. Sparrow? Me with the bedraggled hair, the long, drawn out eyes from all the headaches you give me and my...

Oh who am I kidding? Everyone's going to believe the birds- cunning little chirpers!

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Write Articles for Publication 2 -Assignment 1

Part 1-Search the web for some information that is wrong, dubious, or in some way questionable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_vandelism.svg




This picture isn't very clear so if you actually want to beable to read what it says I'd use the link above if I were you!

It is meant to show a vandelised Wikipedia article on sponges. The paragraphs that have been changed have been highlighted in yellow. The sentence that has been added is highlighted in green, meaning it wasn't in the original version. I selected this page to show how easily Wikipedia pages can be changed by one thoughtless person who wants to edit or destroy someone's work. (The writing highlighted in green reads "Get a life losers".) I'm sure the author of the original article didn't find that comment amusing.




Part 2-If you do not already have one, start a blog. Write an article about blogs and include interviews with three bloggers. Take a photo and put it on the blog.


Blogs are becoming more useful everyday.

Regular bloggers: Sarah Jones, Tanya Souter and Hannah Graul explain why blogs are so useful and popular in these technological times.

"So what is a blog?" This is what I have asked myself over the past few weeks as I have undertaken this assignment. A blog is an online diary; which an individual records their activities,events, feelings and interests for anyone on the internet to view on a fairly regular basis. The earliest 'blogs' were recorded in 1993 and 1994. The term "weblog" was coined by Jorn Barger on 17 December 1997. Peter Merholz created the short form, "blog," and jokingly separated "weblog" into the phrase "we blog" in the sidebar of his blog Peterme.com in April or May
1999. By August 1999, Evan Williams used "blog" as both a noun and verb ("to blog," meaning "to edit one's weblog or to post on one's weblog").

Professional Writing student Sarah Jones has a personal blog at http://sarahshideaway.blogspot.com/ which features some of her interests... scouting, politics and humour. Sarah believes people use blogs to "... share with friends and family what is happening. Alternatively it is used to have their written work out there in the public arena or to have a platform for their message (political, social commentary etc.)"


Tanya Souter reads a lot of genre based blogs because of her love of craft. She visits blogs such as http://www.dawnmcvey.typepad.com/ , http://www.makeeshabyl.com.au/ , and http://www.sew-and-so.blogspot.com/. Genre based blogs can be focused on just about anything from photography to travel blogs. Blogs can also be used to advertise one's business. Tanya also explained people use blogs so "...they can link up with people that are interested in the same things. It could be a hobby or it could be your job. You can get your ideas out, or pick up ideas from other people; practical ideas about what other people do in their profession. I know my husband looks at ambulance blogs and gets ideas about what goes on, how paramedics work in different countries."


Tanya also added, "It's kinda fun, reading about what other people think about everything, their experiences. Some blogs are also used for information because a lot of blogs will have how to-s like craft blogs that explain how to make things."






Medical student Hannah Graul reads a lot of health blogs and stated, "It's not boring like reading a book full of research papers. It's good to read those kind of blogs as they tend to link to other blogs. So I start reading that blog and work outwards. There are lots of other sites that are connected to that blog. It can be interesting to read something that's scientific but it gets really dry and boring really quickly. It's a good way to put myself to sleep so I try not to read them too much."



One particular science blog Hannah reads is called "Mind Hacks". http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com
" That's about Neuroplasticity; about how people are researching how the brain can change and do interesting things that weren't previously thought possible. So that's quite interesting and the person (author of the blog) is usually quite entertaining to read."




I have discovered that blogs are useful for many things. Whether they are being used for business, finishing an assignment, catching up with family and friends, reading about special interests or buying products, blogs are helping many people achieve their goals in one way or another. So what would you like to blog about?



References

Part 1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_vandalism.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia



Part 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog

http://www.blockstar.com/blog/blog_timeline.html

http://www.slais.ubc.ca/courses/libr500/05-06-wt1/www/A_Cho/history.htm

http://sarahshideaway.blogspot.com/

http://www.makeeshabyl.com.au/

http://www.sew-and-so.blogspot.com/

http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Cute Koala Photos

I received these pics in an email this morning from a friend and couldn't resist adding them here.
Give me cute and cuddly animal photos anyday :D


The photos are entitled: The New Baby.
A Koala's Progress


Enjoy!




Hope you said "Awwwwwwwwww" as many times as I did!